Talk:Environmental Defenders Office

Comments
The article had been up only a few minutes. Give me a couple of days to add more meat. The importance of this network can be seen from looking at some of the cases handled by just one office: [NSW EDO cases] dinghy (talk) 13:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll leave it for now per the discussion we had about the other article you created. As before, feel free to contact me if you need any help. Ironholds (talk) 13:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks dinghy (talk) 05:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I am familiar with ANEDO's work. Notability should be able to be established, but I wouldn't rely on existing casework so much as some past case outcomes and public profile, lobbying role. Good luck dinghy. Cheers. hamiltonstone (talk) 22:57, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Hopefully have done enough to keep the article intact. However, I still suggest that current cases should not be convered in the article. It needs some third party reports (law reports, non-ANEDO newsletters) of results of concluded cases in which ANEDO had a role. Cheers. hamiltonstone (talk) 23:51, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on EDOs of Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090326041520/http://www.edo.org.au:80/edonsw/site/casework_key.php to http://www.edo.org.au/edonsw/site/casework_key.php
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130513014530/http://www.edo.org.au/edoqld/news/edo-qld-funding-update/ to http://www.edo.org.au/edoqld/news/edo-qld-funding-update/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:49, 18 December 2016 (UTC)