Talk:Environmental consulting

NPOV?
This page's current incarnation looks like someone venting, rather than an encyclopedia article. Is there any significant amount of encyclopedic content that could logically go here, rather than under Environmental law or Consulting or Compliance (regulation)? --Quuxplusone 22:48, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm a neutral party that got here by the "Random Page" link...nothing looks out of the ordinary. Leave it alone, I say. --Zpb52 01:24, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)

"True Environmental Consultants should have a undergraduate degree at the minimum and a master's degree" - seems rather subjective

Unsourced Info
"If an environmental problem is discovered property owners that deem themselves a responsible party will most likely reserve monies in escrow in order to resolve the environmental impact." Huh? This is unsourced and, in my experience as a consultant, untrue. Can someone verify this info? —Preceding unsigned comment added by CPitt76 (talk • contribs) 06:31, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed merge
A green consultant is different from an environmental consultant. A E.C. works with mitigation for cleanup. A G.C. helps a businness green up it's operation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Centennialgreen (talk • contribs) 04:26, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

I propose a merge of Green Consulting into Environmental consulting. Neither article is great, but the two areas are not distinct enough to warrant separate articles, and Green Consulting is too much of a vague neologism. Fences &amp;  Windows  03:56, 6 July 2009 (UTC)