Talk:Envivio

The references of this article need to be improved for making disappeared the issue at the top. Please help us with that. This is just an informative article for people interested in the video processing software. If you are interested in the market side, go ti the website in the external link. THIS IS NOT ADVERTISING. Please maintain the article in this informative way and don't remove information that could be interesting for some people. Thank you. ≈Marcalsig≈

MarnetteD, I read all kind of rules before adding info to this article. Editor's removing the info probably come from a competitor company of Envivio. That's not politicly correct neither. My article has been reviewed with important press writer to be in an informative way, not in an advertising way. I'll continue adding information about this company, and other companies of the video processing world. That's why know there are just some pages and not as much as what the company that. I'm working on it. ≈Marcalsig≈


 * The problem is that there don't appear to be any suitable references to use. If the ones used for the awards section are the best that there are then we shouldn't have an article about the company here. I have searched the factiva database to find news articles about the company in reputable newspapers but can't find anything but press releases. Unless I have missed something the company doesn't meet our notability requirements and should be deleted. SmartSE (talk) 21:02, 28 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Is not a really known company as is very specialised but is a real company and almost important in the world of video software processing, I think that is interesting for people interested in this kind of new technology. Maybe there are not articles in reputable regular newspapers but yes in reputable magazines which are specialised in video. I didn't finished to edit the article jet and I'll put more content and references the next days, but please don't remove it without explaining why. I think some editor's have fun removing things that others had done. . I thought my references where good enough but I'll look for better ones. Also I have a good references you can look at which is the first one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcalsig (talk • contribs) 22:22, 28 August 2014 (UTC)