Talk:Envy (2004 film)

Reception
The article states the film went straight to video in Europe. This is incorrect, as the film was released in cinemas in the UK. I know this, as I was daft enough to pay money to see it. paulwmk (talk)

comment
This movie was hilarious. Is there an underground cult following starting to grow, or does everyone still hate it? 216.114.201.147 00:35, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Envy film poster.jpg
Image:Envy film poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

NPOV
In both the introduction and the reception rating there are numerous NPOV violations, unsourced statements and in the case of the Rotten Tomatoes reference a reference that is both unsourced and in the case of the Rotten Tomatoes reference it references a rating at a specific time but fails to specify what time that data was culled. I'd be tempted to try to rework it but for the life of me don't think I could do so without gutting large chunks of the introduction to do so. Cat-five - talk 02:42, 3 September 2008 (UTC)