Talk:Epacris impressa/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 02:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

: The article looks to comply with MoS policies on prose, grammar, and structure. Spring in Wikipedia is lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 00:08, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

: The article uses a very healthy and extensive list of published third-party sources. It does not look as though any original research has been incorporated. Spring in Wikipedia is lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 00:06, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)
 * (c)

: The article is very broad in its coverage; extensive but not excessive detail is applied to all encyclopedic aspects of the subject. Spring in Wikipedia is lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 00:04, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

. The article shows no bias towards or against the topic covered. Spring in Wikipedia is lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 00:03, 11 July 2014 (UTC) . No sign of any edit warring taking place in the past couple of years, as evidenced in the revision history. Spring in Wikipedia is lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 02:31, 20 June 2014 (UTC) : The article is well-illustrated with relevant images, all of which are appropriately licensed. Spring in Wikipedia is lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 02:33, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)


 * Errrr, ....yoo hooo......cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:42, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry, it slipped my mind. I'll get back to this either today or tomorrow. Spring in Wikipedia is lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 17:49, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Ok no worries. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:44, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

I apologize for the long wait, but I'm pleased to say that my review of the article brings me to the conclusion that it satisfies the GA criteria. Congratulations!!! Spring in Wikipedia is lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 00:11, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
 * No problem - thanks for the review! Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:17, 11 July 2014 (UTC)