Talk:Epicurious

The website matter is fine, but I think the term you are looking for (in the second definition) is "bi-curious." Using "epicurious" is, I think, a malapropism. One usage by what appears to be a screenname does not define a word. I'm not sure what the citation is for that word but it is certainly not common usage. I am deleting the matter, but will gladly see it reinstated if someone can explain this to me.Polkapolkapoker 23:06, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Epicurious. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/19990302094138/http://www.epicurious.com/ to http://www.epicurious.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:34, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Updated Awards Section Needed
I haven't yet learned how to modify Wikipedia (on my list), but the awards section ends in 2015. I got the impression from this that the website (Epicurious) had gone into disfavor after the updated design. However, a glance at the Webbys indicate that it won or was mentioned again several times in the years since.

Ordinarily I wouldn't care, but because I got the wrong impression, I thought it was important. Thanks. BobPango (talk) 18:34, 22 April 2022 (UTC)