Talk:Epistructural tension

Why is this article tagged as not linked to other wikipedia articles? That is simply not true!

The article is linked to the following wikipedia articles:

Benjamin Widom dehydron protein interaction — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.253.249.199 (talk)


 * Some of the issues . The Anonymouse (talk &#124; contribs) 05:47, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

THIS ARTICLE IS NO LONGER AN ORPHAN
This article is no longer an orphan. The following article links to it: https://www.cs.uchicago.edu/people/ariel

Please remove tag. Thanks. 190.137.25.136 (talk) 21:35, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

THE ARTICLE IS NO LONGER AN ORPHAN THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE LINKS TO IT:

http://colbas.academia.edu/ArielFernandez — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.225.68.227 (talk) 13:06, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because it describes an important biophysical property that drives protein associations. The finding was regarded as noteworthy by the American Physical Society, as evidenced by the review of the discovery in Physics Focus. This review may be found in http://physics.aps.org/articles/v5/51

The discoverer of epistructural tension is Ariel Fernandez and his mentioning in the article is not promotional but serves to describe the history of this concept. Any promotional features in the article will be now removed, while the review by the APS will be highlighted.

Haydee BelinkyHaydee Belinky (talk) 15:11, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because it describes an important biophysical property that drives protein associations. The finding was regarded as noteworthy by the American Physical Society, as evidenced by the review of the discovery in Physics Focus. This review may be found in http://physics.aps.org/articles/v5/51 The discoverer of epistructural tension is Ariel Fernandez and his mentioning in the article is not promotional but serves to describe the history of this concept. Any promotional features in the article will be now removed, while the review by the APS will be highlighted. Haydee BelinkyHaydee Belinky (talk) 15:11, 7 February 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haydee Belinky (talk • contribs)

I don't see anything promotional in the article at least in its current version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.28.240.166 (talk) 17:12, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Not promotional in current version
I don't see anything promotional in the article, at least in the current version. This is a discovery covered by APS News and the name of the discoverer is given. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.28.240.166 (talk) 17:15, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * very SPI-y. Jytdog (talk) 18:56, 7 February 2014 (UTC)