Talk:Eppur Si Muove (The West Wing)/GA3

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

This GA was super long ago, and I don't think this meets GA standards anymore. I have problems with the prose, reception section, and broadness. Pining for another opinion. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 19:53, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Appreciate the ping. Unsourced statements, no reception section, very limited references and the infobox image doesn't have sufficient detailed commentary in the body (the standard is that a critic needs to say "the use of wide cuts in this scene was great" or "this scene was difficult to film because of the physically small set" or whatever, and for most episodes a non-free image can usually not be used at all). It's a 2007 GA but not a 2021 GA (more like Start-class or maybe C-class). — Bilorv ( talk ) 20:44, 26 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delist - further, it looks to me like the entire social and cultural references section is problematic. The connection with the Galileo quote is WP:OR (the source cited appears to have been published before this episode airs), the TVC stuff shouldn't be relying on the TCV as a source, and the last part is unsourced trivia. I'm not convinced that the WWEG source is particularly reliable, there's nothing about production, and there's nothing about reception.  As it stands, we've got a plot summary and some trivia.  Not very close to the GA criteria, IMO. Hog Farm Talk 22:34, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , Maybe it's time to delist or keep the article? It's an individual reassessment so only you can close it. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  14:02, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * And I think it's a pretty clear case of delist FWIW. — Bilorv ( talk ) 20:40, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's time. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 09:22, 18 July 2021 (UTC)