Talk:Equal Education

Controversies
Earlier this year I added the controversy section to capture an important controversy relating to the organisation.Didgeridoo2022 suggested these edits were Disruptive Editing and removed them. I have undone that change: the edits were not disruptive. Other editors already noted that the article reads like an advertisement. I welcome alternative suggestions on how to write the section but it should not be removed. LeagleZA (talk) 20:38, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Tenth anniversary importance
Under the history section, there is a fairly substantial paragraph dedicated to the movement's tenth anniversary. Most of the information that it includes could easily be integrated with other paragraphs, and it reads very much like puffery.

The sentence below that is similarly flawed, in addition to failing MOS:DATED and being two years out of date. Ships &amp;  Space (Edits) 01:18, 17 April 2024 (UTC)