Talk:Equilibrium price

cleanup-rewrite
This article, while interesting, doesn't read like an encylopedia article at all, but more like a section from a textbook. This is not appropriate for wikipedia. Needs to be rewritten. --Xyzzyplugh 13:46, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The article is perfect BECAUSE it doesn't read like a wikipedia article. We want to get as far as we can from that. Although I think the math maybe wrong. -G
 * The solution was correct but the display of the math was ugly and unreadable. I have tidied it up and made it far easier to figure out how the solution was arrived at. Note that the solution there has nothing whatever to do with the example in the schedule that followed. JJMcVey 08:00, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Merger proposal

 * Agree. I vote in favour of the merger. JJMcVey 08:11, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Agree. Covers the same subject, essentially. GregorB 17:26, 3 November 2007 (UTC)