Talk:Equitable Life Assurance Society v Hyman

Importance scale????
I don't remember a single contract law case more bitterly contested or more widely followed than this one where equity was overridden by the requirement to meet implied terms. How it is of low importance I'll never know. JRPG (talk) 20:04, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


 * A very important ruling. And — opinion rather than certifiable usable Wikipediable fact — an abysmal ruling, of which their Lordships should be ashamed. JDAWiseman (talk) 23:29, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Equitable Life Assurance Society v Hyman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080907195013/http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld199900/ldjudgmt/jd000720/equite-1.htm to http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld199900/ldjudgmt/jd000720/equite-1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:42, 22 September 2017 (UTC)