Talk:Era name

WikiProject Time assessment rating comment
Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving. -- Yamara 03:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Discussion
Merge with a non-existing article? Kokiri 18:17, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Regnal year exists now, and discusses Asian Era names, but if the merge request is really over three years old, maybe we should just call it MERGE REJECTED and move on? I'm told the two articles should be very different in scope... --Yamara 03:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Actually, the current merge request dates back only to May 2007: 10:05, 22 May 2007 Dbachmann (Talk | contribs) (1,243 bytes) -- Yamara 03:05, 17 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm giving the merge request till the end of this month to come up with discussion, or I'll close it unilaterally. Asian era names and Regnal year epochs are similar, but easily deserve their own articles. No Merge. —Yamara ✉  17:01, 10 February 2008 (UTC)