Talk:Ercilla, Chile

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Ercilla, Chile. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070911130719/http://www.world-time-zones.org/zones/chile-time.htm to http://www.world-time-zones.org/zones/chile-time.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070911130451/http://www.world-time-zones.org/zones/chile-summer-time.htm to http://www.world-time-zones.org/zones/chile-summer-time.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 18 January 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

– Primary meaning, a breif look into what quality internet content show as Ercilla makes it clear it is the commune and town and not the writer, also in everyday speech in Chile Ercilla is a place not a writer. It is worth noting that Spanish Wikipedia have also the town and commune as the primary meaning for Ercilla. Dentren &#124; Talk 08:56, 18 January 2021 (UTC) —Relisted.  P.I. Ellsworth   ed.  put'r there 16:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Ercilla, Chile → Ercilla
 * Ercilla → Ercilla (disambiguation)
 * Note: Ercilla titles a dab page with significant content and so is ineligible as a "new" page title unless it is also renamed. This request has been altered to reflect that fact.  P.I. Ellsworth   ed.  put'r there 16:49, 25 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Move the DAB to the base name per views the place gets 29 views but the magazine gets 15 and the plant gets 14, the writer has 206[] but he's a PTM for the single word.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 10:55, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Support DAB at base name, no WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.--Ortizesp (talk) 17:38, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: Setting Ercilla as a disambiguation page will sent 100% of viewers to the wrong page (the disambiguation page). Instead having Ercilla being the town will at least give many the right page. How many we dont know, because we can not know what page people are expecting to see when they type or click at Ercilla, but there a case that people searching for the poet will do so by his name, while for those seeking the town and commune it will be less obvious to type ", Chile" to obtain the right result. Dentren &#124; Talk 07:03, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Firstly per WP:NOPRIMARY a DAB page should be at the base name even if there are just 2 options (though per WP:2DABPRIMARY we can have a lower threshold) secondly there are 5 entries on the DAB, even leaving the poet and asteroid aside the magazine and plant get as many views as the place anyway so having the place at the base name would inconvenience more people than it would help however I would support that over the stats quo but as far as I can see there's no primary topic so that's the best option.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 11:20, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * You moved the DAB to the basename this morning but didn't close this request. Its now been modified to a multi-move by Paine Ellsworth due to the DAB now being located at the target. Did you mean to close this RM as consensus for the DAB like Talk:Henry Kessler (baseball) or did you intend this be relisted to see if there is consensus to make the place primary? Even if you did intend to close this is could just be left open anyway but the DAB has been supported by both participants (not counting nom) and the evidence given supports this.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 17:24, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I did not close because it was not expired yet. The dab page was not, strictly speaking, part of the move request. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  22:55, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose – no primarytopic; leave dab at base name. Dicklyon (talk) 07:32, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose per my evidence above, there's no primary topic.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 11:17, 26 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.