Talk:Erdős–Faber–Lovász conjecture

Very deep
The term "very deep" is used in the first paragraph of the current version. I don't know if this is a technical term, and if it is, what does it mean? If it is not, there must be a better term than "very deep." Please clarify. Oswald Glinkmeyer (talk) 01:16, 26 October 2009 (UTC)


 * It's been there since the start of this article, but I'm not sure what it's supposed to mean either. It doesn't seem to fit the definition in Mathematical jargon: it's not a result, it's a problem, so we don't know what sort of techniques would be needed to solve it. I think it's just editorialization, and should probably just be removed. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:35, 26 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Great. If someone thinks it needs to be in there, they can better clarify when they add it back. Oswald Glinkmeyer (talk) 19:05, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Erdős–Faber–Lovász conjecture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706202317/http://lists.rmc.ca/academic/math_cs/tardif/paper25/paper25.pdf to http://lists.rmc.ca/academic/math_cs/tardif/paper25/paper25.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:43, 25 December 2016 (UTC)