Talk:Erection/Archive 2

Untitled
Please tell me why when I post a video of female ejaculation, oral sex, plain sex, tampon insertion and removal, or female masturbation, they are always deleted as non-educational. They say a drawing would do fine. However, any images that appeal to homosexuals such as autofellatio, ejaculation, male masturbation, penis pics, erection pics are left for children to view at school. My children's school currently allows anyone to view Wikipedia files openly and my daughter has reported seeing these masturbation vids at school. This has been brought up at a recent school board meeting and they said that since Wikipedia cannot filter pornographic content it will no longer be allowed. They are in the process of an IT specialist setting up a permanent block on Wikipedia. Way to go Wikipedia, we now must block all useful information to a large group to please a very small group of deviants.

Stone Westray —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leftwinga19 (talk • contribs) 03:00, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

The pictures MUST, be deleted due to public indecency and harrassment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.123.210.230 (talk) 19:02, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The tone of the above comments suggests that they are nothing more than discussion page spam. If they are serious comments then the individuals that made them are nothing more than bigots & hypocrits. User Leftwinga19 whines about the "erection pics" on the page and the fact that school children may see them but admits to posting videos of female ejaculation and female masturbation. Can you spell "hypocrit" Leftwinga19? Perhaps you should check out these two pages before making any more comments: "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigot" & "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy". Wikipedia is not censored and the pictures serve a purpose, they should remain. Swampy 121.212.128.163 (talk) 19:36, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

recently added pics are pointless and fetish-y
The cut and uncut erection pics suit the "pineapple" rule, but there is no reason for posting the erection through underwear or the non-curvy erection -- someone is just having their fun by posting them. They should go.

69.3.236.117 (talk) 03:45, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

uncircumcised erection
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Narutoman1017 (talk • contribs) 02:19, 3 July 2009 (UTC)