Talk:Erhard Heiden/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Biblioworm (talk · contribs) 02:06, 12 May 2015 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * 2) It is verifiable.
 * 3) It is broad in its coverage.
 * 4) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * 5) It is stable.
 * 6) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * 7) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: Pass