Talk:Eric Chaisson

Multiple issues template?
I see this article has a 'multiple issues' template but there is no indication on this talk page of what issues the editor who posted that believes need to be addressed. To me the article seems to be somewhat on the brief side and could do with expanding, but I see no signs of violations of wikipedia policies. Can anyone be specific about what needs to be done. If not, I suggest taking off the notice in say a couple of weeks. DaveApter (talk) 12:45, 29 June 2016 (UTC)


 * If you check out the article's history, it's largely written by Chaisson himself with edits such as this one and many others. The article needs more/better references and feels promotional, like when I read it, I'm skeptical that that's all there is to the subject?--Tomwsulcer (talk) 13:46, 29 June 2016 (UTC)


 * It's clearly promotional and autobiographical. On the other hand the subject clearly meets notability criteria, and it's not too dreadful, so it's been filed on my "to do eventually" list for quite a while. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 17:01, 29 June 2016 (UTC)