Talk:Erica eugenia

Behavioral Ecology Student Suggestions
One strength about this article is that it is very well cited, referenced, and linked. Good Article standards talk about how having proper references and links to other materials is imperative for a user’s understanding and learning. Other than that, this article has minimal information about the spider, hence its “Stub Class” and “Low-Importance.” After doing a quick Google search of this spider, I can see that very little information is available, and that it is a very minimally known spider. To account for this very basic article, I would suggest including information regard population structure, speciation and phylogeny. If little is known about this spider, having population structure, speciation, and phylogeny can help give supporting background about this spider with regard to its close relatives. While little may be known about this individual spider, linking it to its phylogenetic roots can help illuminate more information about how the spider has evolved to the way it is now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akwan826 (talk • contribs) 18:04, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the suggestions! There is actually quite a bit of information available, but most of the sources are not in English. I have to assume it is Portuguese since Mello-Leitão is from Brazil, but I honestly don't know. If you happen to know Portuguese or know someone who does, a translation of these journals would be greatly appreciated, but until then we are somewhat restricted by the language barrier. Sesame  honey  tart  14:01, 6 October 2020 (UTC)