Talk:Ernest Ingenito

Neutrality and citations
This article, like many others on wikipedia is biased in that it fails to recognize that fathers have rights to. martinelli was a half assed author who didnt know a sedan from a coupe or a magazine from a clip. much of the info in her book was plagerised from J Robert Nash. I hope wikipedia goes broke. But then, where else will psuedo authors attempt to impress one another with their bullshit?

pedi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.28.155.17 (talk) 17:38, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

This article makes very negative statements about some of the victims (especially the mother-in-law). At the very least, these need to be cited, though I suspect that not many (if any) of these can be presented as undisputed facts like they are now. Crusoe704 (talk) 09:32, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree and I have gone through and removed some of the more obvious biased content. What is left needs to be sourced. I have also removed some comments from this talk page (in regards to WP:NOTAFORUM) because another editor, User:Busceda, felt the need to disparage the victims for various personal reasons. Said editor is entitled to his opinion but talk pages are for discussions about improving the article, not for commenting on how you agree with criminal acts because the victims "had it coming" (really, dude?). 24.224.43.225 (talk) 14:35, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Upon closer inspection, I see that only one person has been editing this article to suit their own view on things. I have restored some of the original text which just presented the facts of the case and not some fawning fan's account. I also removed yet another non-article improving related comment from the talk page. 24.224.43.225 (talk) 14:55, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot, the article looks much better now. Crusoe704 (talk) 14:03, 25 October 2012 (UTC)