Talk:Ernst Mayr (computer scientist)

The article consists of nothing but completely direct, neutral, public, verifiable, judgment-free statements. Every sentence without its own footnote can be verified by a web search. Given that I'm not sure it matters if it was written by someone who is 'close' (citation needed for *that*). I think some of the scary warnings can be removed. Can a human tell me what is objectionable about the page? Thanks Jar354 (talk) 13:46, 4 November 2016 (UTC)