Talk:Errors and omissions insurance

Merge
The article seems to be fine as is. Probably it can be expanded for further drill-down information.Bio watcher (talk) 04:11, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


 * The entire article is a quote from another website. I think that E&O insurance should be its own page, but it doesn't seem to be "fine as is." GuJiaXian (talk) 18:22, 15 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Indeed, it was a blatant copyright violation, as well as a conflict of interest and a highly opinionated non-neutral piece of advice. It would certainly have been deleted at WP:AFD. Per the merge proposal, I have taken the salient facts from the article and rewritten them to avoid these problems, then merged the result into ino Professional liability insurance (the ultimate merge target of Professional indemnity insurance which was the first choice of where to merge Errors and omissions insurance into). I have no opinion on whether or not E&O insurance ultimately needs its own article, but there was not material for one, so per WP:SUMMARY there's no reason at this stage for a split-off article separate from the main topic into which this has been merged. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 17:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)