Talk:Erschallet, ihr Lieder, erklinget, ihr Saiten! BWV 172/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 19:29, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Will review within 72 hours.♦ Dr. Blofeld  19:29, 8 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Wondering why Thomaskantor and Konzertmeister are italicized. I gather this is the convention in your articles but I was wondering why?
 * I understand that all foreign language terms should be italicized. I don't do it for things in quotation marks, such as the titles of hymns, but the titles (first lines) of the movements.


 * "Christoph Wolff suggests that Bach may have studied in Weimar musical settings available in the court library" do you mean books about musical settings?
 * No, musical scores, if I understand the source right.


 * Delink second instance of Gospel of John per OVERLINK.
 * Done. However, the links to verses will always be blue.


 * In scoring you use words for number but use "movement 5", was this intentional? Ideally they should be consistent of course!
 * I looked at it and hope I consistently use now "first" and "second" as words, but "movement 5".


 * Any reason why F major isn't linked in the table and C and A minor are? I'd link it there and remove the links to A minor and F underneath in the text.
 * Only reason: the table was created the latest ;) - done as you said.


 * Can you add a few citations to the recordings section? Ideally the red links should be filled too ;-]
 * all Bach cantatas, ref added, - I know someone who fills red links ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:06, 8 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Done so far, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:17, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Good job, looks adequate for GA.♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:48, 8 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Sounds good, thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:58, 8 January 2014 (UTC)