Talk:Escambia Wood

Major portions of this page come from EPA published material like which are not subject to copyright and are in the public domain. Legacypac (talk) 23:19, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

I recognize http://www.trwnews.net is not a government site but the published document is an unaltered PDF of a government published EPA document, which is why the river watch people can also publish it without copyright concerns. Legacypac (talk) 19:26, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Attribution in the article using Template:Free-content attribution or a more specific template from Category:Attribution templates might be an idea.--Pontificalibus 20:03, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Do you know how? Legacypac (talk) 20:06, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I dont know how many public domain sources were used, or what they were. can you clarify what was copy pasted and from where, and what is your own words.--_Pontificalibus  20:13, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I found this page in the userspace of a long inactive user so I doubt we will get a response. The Earwig tool shows good parts of it (though not all) came from the EPA documents in the refs - the major one being the PDF republished by the trwnews site linked above. The editor melded copied material together with uniquely written material and formatted it all nicely. Legacypac (talk) 20:19, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I added a template but didn't associate it with any particular sources for now.--Pontificalibus 20:58, 24 February 2019 (UTC)