Talk:Eschew

This page is necessary as a basic word page from which a link to the wiktionary page can be found (without having to add them to each page with the word "eschew" on it, for example). ∞ΣɛÞ² (τ 13:07, 12 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Why would a Wiktionary link be necessary? Wiktionary boxes are very useful to add to existing disambiguation pages, but we don't need to create new ones solely to contain them.  --Piet Delport 14:36, 12 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Again, the link is necessary to explain a not very common word... ∞ΣɛÞ² (τ 03:46, 13 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not a dictionary. How many times do we have to tell you this? --Piet Delport 05:47, 13 June 2007 (UTC)


 * As many times as it takes for you to realize Wikipedia is a dictionary. Otherwise, remove all dictionary definitions--NO MATTER HOW VAGUE. But, be warned, most of the articles will be deleted in this course of action. Hypocracy abounds! ∞ΣɛÞ² (τ 06:13, 13 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I admit I didn't know what "eschew" means (and I already forgot its meaning again), but I see two viable solutions that don't get in conflict with Wikipedia is not a dictionary (which I support):
 * 1. Eschew seems to be a small town in South Africa, as claimed in the article Margaret Wild. maps.google.com couldn't find it though, but if it really exists, a stub for Eschew, South Africa may be created, linked to from a dab page, which may also link to Eschew obfuscation.
 * 2. See Juxtaposition, which had the exact same problem. – sgeureka t•c 13:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Ah, thanks. Wi seems more appropriate than the current redirect, yes.  --Piet Delport 14:05, 13 June 2007 (UTC)