Talk:Esenwein & Johnson

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... the firm is notable because it has designed multiple significant works including some listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Article just barely started; it is a work in progress. Sources, offline and online, yet to be added. NRHP nomination documents are among the sources, whose contents are not usually found via Google, so it may not be obvious from google search alone, but this is a notable firm. -- do ncr  am  04:47, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Nominator comment: In view of do  ncr  am 's comment above I now oppose speedy deletion. Good luck with the article. Jschnur (talk) 04:55, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
 * PS I've removed the speedy deletion template. Jschnur (talk) 05:03, 28 September 2012 (UTC)