Talk:Espanto III/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wugapodes (talk · contribs) 23:07, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Note This review is part of a series of reviews by an editor on articles of a similar topic. Because of this, the various reviews may reference each other. Please also see Los Espantos, Espanto I, Espanto II, Espanto III, Espanto IV and V, Espanto Jr., Espanto Jr. (CMLL), and Los Hijos del Espanto if things are unclear. Disclosure: Both the nom and reviewer are participating in the WikiCup, if need be, anyone may request a second opinion if they feel my review is not following the GA criteria. Thanks. Wugapodes [thɔk] [kantʃɻɪbz] 23:07, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Checklist
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria 
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * See below for why this was not quick passed
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * See below for why this was not quick passed
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * See below for why this was not quick passed

Comments
If the comment is numbered, it must be addressed for the article to pass, if it is bulleted, it's an optional suggestion or comment that you don't need to act on right now. When I quote things, you can use ctrl+f to search the page for the specific line I quoted.
 * "Los Espantos was one of the first examples of an identical trio, where all three members of the team used the same name, mask and wrestling gear only distinguished by a number." I think I've seen this before and recommend it be added other places, but if not, this is an interesting fact that should be in other articles on the first 3 Espantos.

Results
On hold until passage of other Espantos articles. While nothing is particularly wrong with this article on its own, because this article shares a number of similarities with the prose in Los Espantos, Espanto I, and Espanto II, I'm going to hold off on passing it until I close those ones to make sure this one also benefits from the changes and mild expansions going on there. Basically I'm invoking WP:IAR as I'm not comfortable passing this knowing the other highly similar articles are still being changed, and want to make sure this one benefits from any modifications going on there. I'd be open to discuss this decision however if the nom or other editors object. Wugapodes [thɔk] [kantʃɻɪbz] 03:18, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * - I have no problems holding off on a decision on ths one until the Epantos, I and II articles have hit their mark, no worries on my part.  MPJ  -US 03:30, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Passed Wugapodes [thɔk] [kantʃɻɪbz] 03:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC)