Talk:Esplanade MRT station/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ArnabSaha (talk · contribs) 06:39, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Comments

 * I have resolved some grammar issues.
 * Avoid sentences ending with preposition (Ending a sentence with a preposition. Also thanks User:Tamzin for this info- "to which ..." is the fancy way popularized by the Romantics and which was taught as the only correct way until recently. "... to" is the way that was historically correct and has in the past ~20 years become accepted again in some (but not all) academic circles.)
 * Move the platform image to station details. I feel, it will suit more there.
 * Add author name in sources. Like citation [15]
 * Year of name change not mentioned in body. Also the Suntec Singapore Convention and Exhibition Centre.
 * Link the first Marina MRT, Circle line in history.
 * Add citations for parking and disable access.

 Saha ❯❯❯  Stay safe    16:27, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Addressed concerns stated above.--ZKang123 (talk) 04:28, 14 July 2021 (UTC)


 * also add this in the body- Suntec Singapore Convention and Exhibition Centre  Saha ❯❯❯  Stay safe    07:36, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Added.--ZKang123 (talk) 08:46, 14 July 2021 (UTC)