Talk:Essex skipper

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Essex skipper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070615060834/http://www.erin.utoronto.ca/~w3full/reprints/FullNapolDielAB.pdf to http://www.erin.utoronto.ca/~w3full/reprints/FullNapolDielAB.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:21, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments
It was interesting to know that the Essex skipper was accidently introduce to Canada. Also, eggs do not hatch until after winter and I thought that was really cool. It is because most of the butterflies that I have looked at, hatch in late summer and fall. I think that the content provided is a good starting place, but more work needs to be done. Of the categories listed the information is just enough to provide insight as to how the butterfly works. I first wanted to point out the that the article is missing a table of contents and that makes it harder for people to know what kind of information that the article contains. A category that could be added to help the article is one about habitat. It is because just stating that the butterfly lives in certain countries is not enough. Another, category that could be added is social behavior of both the caterpillar and butterfly. I think that adding this category could show where the two are similar and different from each other, besides morphology. However, before having a category about social behavior, I think that having a category about the life history of the Essex skipper would be good to know. It is because it can provide some insight and background knowledge before going to the next topic of social behavior. There is only one other comment on the comment page so that leads me to know that no one is really trying to improve this article. The article is rated as Start-class and low-importance. What that means is that the article has content, but could use quite a bit more to improve its status.WAdekunle (talk) 09:00, 21 October 2017 (UTC)