Talk:Estera Foundation

Lack of focus
This article seems to confuse two topics: Estera Fund, which doesn't seem to be notable, and Miriam Shaded, a person who likely is notable. It should be rewritten and renamed accordingly. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 13:09, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I would second renaming (with subsequent reordering of text. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:19, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I would do it all if I just knew how to do it right :( - Another problem is I used a bad word for the lemma. Instead of "Estera-Fund" it should be "Estera-Foundation" .. it would be nice if somebody could change it, I changed the mistakes in the source/text but I don't know how to change it in the Lemma. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blazejay (talk • contribs) 21:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 19 May 2016

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Not moved. As Anarchyte says, split off or refocus the article first. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 10:58, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Estera Fund → Miriam Shaded – See above. The article in pl-wp is pl:Miriam Shaded Staszek Lem (talk) 22:19, 19 May 2016 (UTC) -- Relisting.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   07:15, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Oppose until this get split into two seperate articles or this becomes primarily about Miriam Shaded. At the moment, the article is talking about the Estera Fund.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   07:17, 4 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.