Talk:Et seq.

Expansion
I've also seen the derivation given as "et sequens", "et sequentes", "et sequitur" (et cetera). Anyone know which is correct? --Rmbharat 01:25, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Not just legal
This is not specifically a *legal* term. I have seen it used in, for example, a physics book.

I have also seen it in history books, eg. "1807 et seq." refers to that year and those that follow it. Bastie 15:48, 26 January 2007 (UTC)