Talk:Eternal derby (Romania)

Image copyright problem with File:Dinamo Bucuresti.png
The image File:Dinamo Bucuresti.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:


 * File:Steaua.png

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --05:27, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Refereces
These part of the introduction is full of original research, I'm removing it until someone can find reliable sources to back the statments.
 * "These two teams are the far most popular in the country, even though percentages are relative and are never stable. Steaua had more fans in the communist years because it was the team supported by the dictatorship and had big advantages face to others starting from political support of forcing players to play for them ( sometimes they were sent to military service in case they refused ) and to clear refereeing advantages. Dinamo also had support from the Ministry of Internal Affairs but it was never comparable to its rival.
 * After 1989 situations started to change as it was never clear what team was actually had more fans in the country. For example in 1997-1999 period it was widely reported that Rapid Bucuresti had the most fans across the country and was treated a lot like the first club who gained a title in 1998-1999 under total private leadership ( Steaua was still leaded by people with influence in the government ) while after 2000 Dinamo toped a lot of statistics while Steaua regained popularity once Gigi Becali took over the club and as he was a very popular persons the club gained a lot of superficial fans around Bucharest and Romania.
 * In 1995 the first ultras groups started to appear in Dinamo Bucharest's North End who later in 1996 became the widely known Nuova Guardia. Steaua also had a group named Armata Ultra that later dissolved even though some still consider a lot of groups active even though by the rules of Ultras they had to dissolve."

//Luciandrei (talk) 19:46, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Cupa Ligii

 * @User talk:Eddie Nixon - first : this is the ENGLISH WIKIPEDIA; in this wiki English language is accepted. If you don't know what Wikipedia is please check the Wikipedia article
 * second : sources that are NOT reliable should not be considered as good sources
 * third : since you are naming yourself as a fan your bias should NOT allow you to modify articles as you please
 * final : I'm reverting your changes since you don't seem to understand the role of Wikipedia --User talk:Nashu2k 19:14, 20 May 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm not going to debate how Wikipedia works. If you don't understand the term reliable you probably should not edit pages on Wikipedia. User talk:Nashu2k

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 one external links on Eternal derby (Romania). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140131165639/http://www.rsssf.com:80/tablesr/roem70.html to http://www.rsssf.com/tablesr/roem70.html
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140131165639/http://www.rsssf.com:80/tablesr/roem70.html to http://www.rsssf.com/tablesr/roem70.html
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140131165644/http://www.rsssf.com:80/tablesr/roem71.html to http://www.rsssf.com/tablesr/roem71.html
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140131165644/http://www.rsssf.com:80/tablesr/roem71.html to http://www.rsssf.com/tablesr/roem71.html
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140131165805/http://www.rsssf.com:80/tablesr/roem87.html to http://www.rsssf.com/tablesr/roem87.html
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150726041536/http://www.rsssf.com:80/tablesr/roem88.html to http://www.rsssf.com/tablesr/roem88.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Need some opinions (CSA - FCSB dispute)
Hello there fellow editors! My opinion is that we should lead people to FC Steaua Bucuresti for the teams section, and for the first meeting, as for the matches, we should lead readers to the team currently playing, either be it CSA Steaua București (football) or FCSB). I wanted first to get some opinions on this, to avoid edit wars. Share your opinions down below! EditingMatthew (talk) 13:22, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Use of 'Steaua' and 'FCSB'
This fixture has taken place 185 times over a 75-year period. For the great majority of those, the two teams competing were Dinamo București and Steaua București. The fact that Steaua (or at least a Steaua) was renamed FCSB in 2017 doesn't change that. My edit was to make clear that it was called Steaua when it was called Steaua, and FCSB when it was called FCSB. For instance, a team called FCSB did not win the European Cup. has reverted, with the edit summary "For now, according to UEFA, this team's name is FCSB. Steaua is a team that plays in League 2 and isn't included in this rivalry." But it's not a question of what it's name is now, still less what another team's name is now; it's what the name of the club was the 185 times it played Dinamo. I am partially reverting, and changing to "Steaua/FCSB" where appropriate. Scolaire (talk) 13:28, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * It is a team that used many names during its existence. So why don't we use CSCA/CCA/Steaua/FCSB ??? We should use only its current name IMO Cetateanul Rosu (talk) 14:08, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I did actually use "CSCA/CCA/Steaua/FCSB", where it clearly matters that there were four different names. For most of the article, however, only two names matter, and where two names matter, they should both appear. Where only one name was in use on a particular occasion, such as the European Cup win, that is the name that should be used. Scolaire (talk) 15:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)