Talk:Ethan Bronner

Untitled
I deleted references to Bronner's supposed "bias" in covering the Israeli-Palestinian conflict since the source cited to verify this claim is a rather polemical, unscholarly opinion piece. If a statement accusing Bronner of bias is to be used, I would recommend using the following sentence, from the 9 November 2008 version: "Pro-Israel advocacy groups complain his work is anti-Israel; pro-Palestinian groups say it is anti-Palestinian." Jmv2120 (talk) 20:19, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

I removed reporting from a depreciated source and an Opinion piece about it, does someone disagree?
As EI is depreciated per RFC: Electronic Intifada and the other source is an opinion piece, I do not believe that the standard for inclusion (as this is both a BLP and related to Israel/Palestine) is met. Does someone disagree? FortunateSons (talk) 14:42, 26 January 2024 (UTC)