Talk:Etna-class cruiser/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Skinny87 (talk) 15:26, 10 October 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * wl Taranto in the lede?
 * Elswick's full name needs to be given in the Design and description section, as the lede shouldn't be mentioning facts not (completely) found in the main text.
 * Done.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 'For anti-torpedo boat defense the first three ships mounted five 57-millimeter (2.2 in) 6-pounder Hotchkiss guns' - What did the fourth carry? Is this linked to the third (small) paragraph in the Armament section? If so, this should be clarified.
 * It is, and I've rephrased it.
 * The third paragraph in the Armament should be merged into the previous or next paragraph given its small size.
 * Done
 * Did any of the ships do anything specific during the Boxer Rebellion?
 * Nothing that I know about; they probably contributed landing parties, but that's just a guess.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

A few points to be clarified, and then this can be passed. Skinny87 (talk) 15:26, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Wow, you may yet run me out of GANs today! Greatly appreciated, though.
 * I can but try :) Passing now. Skinny87 (talk) 16:47, 10 October 2010 (UTC)