Talk:Eudonia

Merger proposal
I propose that Eudonia vinasalis be merged into Eudonia. I think that the content in the Eudonia vinasalis article can easily be explained in the context of Eudonia, and the Eudonia article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Eudonia vinasalis will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Ausrichter (talk) 23:50, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Eudonia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006084857/http://globiz.pyraloidea.org/Pages/Reports/TaxonReport.aspx to http://globiz.pyraloidea.org/Pages/Reports/TaxonReport.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:29, 26 December 2016 (UTC)