Talk:Eudonia exilis

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Eudonia exilis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006084857/http://globiz.pyraloidea.org/Pages/Reports/TaxonReport.aspx to http://globiz.pyraloidea.org/Pages/Reports/TaxonReport.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:32, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Correct current name of species
I have been unable to find any paper supporting the moving of this species into the Eudonia genus. Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd at present refers to this species as Scoparia (s.l.) exilis. Notes on the most recent research I can find relating to this species are notes made when the Landcare Research in 2011 when it released its photos in the Landcare Research image gallery on New Zealand larger moths. This can be seen here. It may be that this species is within the Eudonia genus but unless a citation supporting this statement can be found or given, I propose to move this page back to "Scoparia exilis". I would be extremely grateful if other editors could assist me in finding a citation for the name Eudonia exilis.--Ambrosia10 (talk) 01:13, 31 January 2018 (UTC)