Talk:Euhelopus

Analysis placing Euhelopus outside Neosauropoda
I'm working on Klamelisaurus right now. The Bayesian analysis of Moore et al. places Euhelopus along with Klamelisaurus and the Mamenchisaurus and Omeisaurus complexes in a clade (Euhelopodidae) outside of Neosauropoda. I'm not sure what other workers think of this, but I think it shows that a macronarian position for Euhelopus is far from a done deal. Lythronaxargestes (talk &#124; contribs) 02:47, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * All of Moore et al.'s analyses find Euhelopus to form a clade with mamenchisaurids, not just the Bayesian analysis, and the paper overall seems to justify that position fairly well. I definitely think it would be prudent to edit this article to be more agnostic on the phylogenetic position of Euhelopus for the time being; presenting it unambiguously as a titanosauriform seems inappropriate now. Ornithopsis (talk) 21:07, 17 July 2020 (UTC)