Talk:Eulaema meriana

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Chtsai016. Peer reviewers: Mkfreiler, Eliseoh, Callisons, Xerylium, Raymundo.marcelo, AddyShak.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Purpose of flight loop
The Biology section states, "At intervals [the male bee] takes off and flies a few metres away from the perch before looping back to land close to its previous spot." Are there any studies on whether this might disperse fragrance or pheromones? --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 13:49, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I think not. There was information that the loop was larger if there were other male territories in close proximity, so perhaps the purpose of the flight is to advertise the male's presence to any passing female. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:05, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Recent Edits
I added a few sections to this article. I added a few details to the descriptive overview and introduction. Additionally I added a section on Taxonomy and Phylogeny, some details about the colony, and behavior within the species. A short section on interaction with parasites was also added. Anything that was present before my edits was moved into the appropriate sections, and were not deleted to respect the original users' contributions. (talk) 23:35, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Your additions to the article are most helpful. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:45, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

I added more sections about mimicry, sociality, and lek behavior to the article, as well as another hypothesis about the wing buzzing of the bee. Short sections of information were also added to other existing sections of the article. (talk) 23:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Editing for Class
I am a student at Washington University in St. Louis and will be editing and making comments on this article for a behavioral ecology class.

A general comment is that Eulaema meriana should be shortened to E. meriana or ''El. meriana''

I would recommend rewording the Description section, particularly the first paragraph where you describe the bee's physical appearance.

I also recommend editing the Taxonomy and Phylogeny section as many of the details given in the middle of the paragraph don't quite fit this section. Also, I'm unclear as to what you mean by "They are the only group among corbiculate bees that are not eusocial bees." It's unclear pronoun use. Does they refer to orchid bees, your bee or something else because Eulaema meriana is not the only non-eusocial corbiculate bee.

To help clarify your Distribution section I'd recommend adding a map of the geographical distribution of your bee. You may also want to move details about orchid bees from the Taxo section to this one. The Taxo and Distribution sections are a bit confusing as you talk both about Eulaema meriana specifically, but also more generally about the Euglossini tribe.

In the pollination section, which genus are you referring to in "In more primitive species in this genus"? I believe you mean Eulaema, but it is unclear. In the last sentence of this section, are you saying that Eulaema meriana is necessary to pollinate orchids, brazil nut tree flowers or both?

In the nest section I made minor wording edits, though you may want to go back and see if you can make things flow better. I deleted a sentence as it was repetitive in this section. Could you add in the brood cell size?

I'd recommend combining the separate sections for Colonies into one. The sentence " For single female nests, each cluster of cells represents the reproductive output for one female, which on average is construction and oviposition over four or five brood cells before disappearing." is confusing. Where/what disappears? You should also clarify the sentence to make it clear the reproductive output is 4-5 constructed and sealed cells, each containing a larva.

I am not sure what you mean by "wing buzzing per perching". Is this when the male's wing buzzes while it is perched or does wing buzzing increase with successive perches?

You should take out the second paragraph of the Territorality section as much of the information has been stated already, so it is very redundant and does not fit with the section. The third paragraph has some poor paraphrasing and is confusing to read. Do multiple transients fly up to a territorial male at the same time?

For the Lek section, how many males perch together? The behavior you write about is interesting, but the crux of a lek is that it is an aggregation of multiple males, which you don't talk about.

For the Parasite section, the beetle is not a parasite of Eulaema meriana. A phoretic relationship is a non-parasitic one, from what I've read. However, the reference does states "the species parasitizing E. meriana is of the phoretic type" so it's very confusing. You may want to dig further and find the original literature to update this. Xerylium (talk • contribs) 22:53, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestions - I will be expanding on this bee for our next Wiki assignment for our class, and will make the appropriate changes in my next upload of revisions and new sections. Chtsai016 (talk) 21:04, 5 October 2015 CT

Editing
Hi! I read through your article and found it to be a very informative and nicely organized article! I think it is one of the best ones I've seen thus far in my behavior ecology class so editing it was particularly difficult. I made some minor changes in simple word choice, punctuation, and syntax to make sentences flow easier for the reader. I do think a geographical distribution map would be beneficial in this specific article since that section was pretty dense in information. Otherwise, I thought your article was a good one!AddyShak (talk) 00:28, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestions - I will be expanding on this bee for our next Wiki assignment for our class, and will make the appropriate changes in my next upload of revisions and new sections. Chtsai016 (talk) 21:04, 5 October 2015 CT

Edit
Hey, I'm a student from Washington University of St. Louis and I just wanted to contribute to your article! I think that your article is one of the most detailed of those I've read so far. Each section that you discuss is explained very thoroughly. There were just a few minor adjustments I made to your article. There was a broken hyperlink with "Eulaema Bombiformis" that I removed. The article for that species does not exist yet. I also included a hyperlink for "oviposition" because it is an unusual word that comes up repeatedly. The hyperlink would allow readers to access information about it more easily. I also found that the "Nest Initiation and construction" section needs a citation. The first paragraph is not supported by any specific resource. I also question whether the author should have included the scavenging cockroaches in the “Interaction with Other species”. There is obviously not a lot of information on it, as they were only found in one of the 76 nests that the source mentions. There is no interaction described, just the mere presence of them. I think you might want to consider if it might be a choice to leave out that section! Overall I really enjoyed reading this article and was impressed by the depth of detail!Matthewkim93 (talk) 02:43, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestions - I will be expanding on this bee for our next Wiki assignment for our class, and will make the appropriate changes in my next upload of revisions and new sections. Chtsai016 (talk) 21:04, 5 October 2015 CT

Edit and Review
This article was well researched and the sections were thoroughly explained, so I did not need to change much, though I made a few simple edits to improve this article. I added a sentence to the end of the overview to better summarize some of the sections included in the article that were not already covered. Order and family information was integrated at the beginning of the “Taxonomy and Phylogeny” section, because it was missing before. As for organization, I moved the “Pollination” section out from under the “Description” section and gave it its own main header. It was placed after “Colonies”, which I thought made more sense than as a part of identification and description. I also added a picture of an orchid in the “Pollination” section, because these bees have a strong relationship with orchid flowers as pollinators. Lastly, I made a few general wording changes and linked “corbiculae” and “asilid flies” for clarity. My remaining suggestion would be to add some information at the very end of the page pertaining to conservation status and human importance/interactions, which would only have to be addressed briefly.

Mkfreiler (talk) 00:16, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Peer Review
Great job with all your work on this bee! There is a lot of good information in here.

I only have a few suggestions:

In the intro paragraph, I found the Orchid description and pollination abrupt and out of place, especially when coming back to “It is territorial…” I understood “It” as the bee yet my mind also wanted to think of “It” as the orchids. So I would either change the wording or get rid of that segment and just have it in the Wikipedia page. Also I think you need to cite a source for the last sentence of the intro paragraph.

In the Description sections, I changed repeated Eulaema meriana to E. meriana, and I added a comma between half and and in “The abdomen is black with three transverse pale yellowish bands on the anterior half, and the posterior third is reddish-brown.” I changed “much thickened” to “much thicker” and I added links to honey bees and stingless bees. Additionally, I don’t think you need to describe stuff about Eulaema in general since you are specifically working with Eulaema meriana.

In the Nests sections, I added a hypen between urn and shaped and a period between “… on the third day” and “A female will spend…” I also suggest having a brief intro paragraph for Nests to help readers get a quick picture of what you will talk about.

In the Colonies section, I added a comma between “nests alone” and “and they remain solitary.” I also linked parasocial and corbicula.

In the Pollination section, I linked primary forest.

In the Behavior section, I linked stereoscope. Like the Nests section, I suggest having a brief intro paragraph to help readers get a quick picture of what you will talk about.

In Mimicry, I linked Batesian mimics and Pleistocene. I italicized E. bombiformis.

In Sociality, I linked polymorphism and deleted a comma between “… in euglossines” and “and how chemical collections…” in the sentence “There is still much discussion on the mechanisms that prevent inbreeding in euglossines and how chemical collections by males influences mating success or paternity.”

Lastly in Interaction with other species, I linked phoretic and ectoparasite. I also added “from” to the sentence “Meloetyphlus fuscatus, a meloid beetle, was observed to emerge from one studied nest.”

However these are really nitpicky things and overall you have lots of good information on this bee! Raymundo.marcelo (talk) 03:05, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Minor edits
There were very minor grammar issues, which I fixed for you, but overall, I found it very difficult to find any issues with the article. The grammar mistakes that I did find were very minor and infrequent. I gave a few recommendations, but overall I thought it was a very well-written, concise, and easy to read article. Definitely one of the best articles I've read so far. Great job!

Recommendations •	A citation is needed for the first paragraph of Nest initiation and construction •	Maybe shorten the “Chemical attraction hypothesis- fragrance dispersal” to just the first part to keep it consistent with the rest of the sections. Callisons (talk) 02:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Peer Review
Hi! This article was such a pleasure to read – it was well written, thoughtful, informative, and factually solid. In fact, it was quite difficult to find anything major that should have been fixed with this article. Personally, I can only suggest a couple of minute changes that I feel would help the reader get the most out of this article. In “Wing Buzzing,” I would specify which studies these hypotheses originate from, to give the reader basis as to why these hypotheses are mentioned. In “Mimicry,” I would use the whole name of “Dressler,” as this name seems to come out of nowhere. In addition, I would specify the study in which he hypothesizes on the bee patterns. In “Sociality,” I think giving a background on what a social bee looks like would inform the reader more clearly about what social behavior is, and how E. meriana differs from other species. All in all, great job! Eliseoh (talk) 03:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Great work on this article! It is clear that a lot of research was put into this entry. It was very well-written, with a lot of unique and informative topics. I rephrased the first sentence of the introduction for ease of flow. Could you add a distribution map? In the Distribution section, you state all of countries that the bee is found. It would be nice to incorporate a map with it for the readers to get a visual cue. I also linked a couple words in the Pollination and Foraging sections. The only other recommendation I have is to group the hypothesis subsections into their own section, separate from the Foraging and Wing Buzzing subsections. But otherwise, I was very pleased. Liz.yucknut (talk) 09:26, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Peer review
This is a very comprehensive and well-written article, covering many different behaviors and elements of the life of this bee. The only significant suggestion that I can think to make is to add more citations, aiming for one alongside every fact rather than paragraph by paragraph, as tedious as that task may become. Other than that, this is an excellent article that does a particularly great job of explaining behaviors in the context of competition and relationships both within the species and with other organisms, particularly the orchids they are named for. Good work! Melliott132 (talk) 17:44, 4 December 2015 (UTC)