Talk:Eumachia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 August 2019 and 18 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Edge-comic-sans1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Untitled
You have a lot of good information and I like how you show Eumachia's significance in Roman history as a model/example for women of her time. However, the chronology of Eumachia's life is difficult to follow. It might be easier to understand if you broke it up into sections (maybe something like Early Life, Eeuergetism, then legacy). Dshabeeb 22:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)Dana Shabeeb

Very nice article. Some links are not working in your piece and it would be great if those could lead to some more information. I would also separate this piece into parts such as her work and how/with what was she remembered. 67.176.177.227 03:10, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Ross Devor

Concise and to the point. Perhaps you could find a picture of some of the statues you've mentioned? Also maybe you could more clearly state her significance to Roman history. Ahmad.m.salah 18:19, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

A very good summary of the available information about Eumachia; sorry Wikipedia wasn't cooperating about the image; perhaps you could simply include a link to it? A bit more information about her significance would have helped. AnisekstrongAnise K. Strong

Peer review Hi User:Edge-comic-sans1 I have read your edits to the Eumachia page on the wikipedia article page. 1. I think the article is well organized and easy to move through. The reader is able to clearly see the information you present in sequence. 2. I would suggest moving the section about the statue after the section titled “History and Significance” so that more emphasis is placed on the object itself, also I feel it is more relevant than the other sections and could benefit from extra development. 3. The writing is clear and you explain the relevant information well. I especially like the lead and the history and significance. The lead is brief, yet provides a quick summary of the subject that users can take away from. I think this is a good content section. 4. In order to add architectural and artistic evidence to the statue, I would encourage you to look art historical sources in the Art and humanities Fordham database to provide more research for the object itself. I would also suggest giving a detailed description of the object along with a short analysis of the most significant features of the artwork. This can be done by using historical knowledge to create a link between the history and the style of the statue of Eumachia.

This is part of a class assignment for a Roman Art course at Fordham

--Marvins-island (talk) 00:42, 26 November 2019 (UTC)User:Marvins-island) 23:26, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Bruh it's not an object, it's lady. Women aren't objects. #RespectWomen — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheItalianStallion13 (talk • contribs) 04:31, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Roman Art
— Assignment last updated by Artever (talk) 15:04, 18 November 2022 (UTC)