Talk:EuropaBio

Notability
Any opinions on notability? We currently have one third-party ref, a story in the UK Guardian. Googling returns a few PR releases and some blog posts but little reliable independent coverage. At the same time, a large trade organisation representing a major industry is not an unreasonable subject for a Wikipedia article. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:33, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Unquestionably notable. Guardian is a secondary source that conforms with WP:RS. Primary content from the organisations website is usable in the context of outlining what its directives are -- Semitransgenic talk. 11:51, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

There is no way this wikipedia can be used as a reference as it is factually wrong in many instances and does not give the overview of what EuropaBio actually is. For the correct information, we suggest the association's website is used. www.europabio.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.64.37.236 (talk) 09:32, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on EuropaBio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080208171633/http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/home/ to http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/home

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:28, 15 April 2017 (UTC)