Talk:European Committee on Radiation Risk

Notability
As the creator of this rather thin article I need to answer the "lack of notabilty" criticism made in the page history. Although it's an unofficial committee associated with some European Green Party members of the European Parliament, governments and quasi-official bodies (for example Pubmed in the U.S. and the Health Protection Agency in the U.K.)  give it weight more in accordance with an official committee of the EU as its name implies, rather than the grandly titled pressure group it seems to be in reality. In itself not a justification of notability, but the the number of external references to it in this context make it so. It's useful to have its true, unofficial status on record. --Old Moonraker (talk) 18:37, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Three new refs, including Hansard. We now seem justified in striking the "NN" tag. --Old Moonraker (talk) 14:24, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Multiple issues tag
Verbal, exactly which peacock terms are you referring to? Johnfos (talk) 21:51, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * See, partly, the comment above. Verbal   chat  14:19, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I was attempting to deal with the notability issue, not peacock. Now a little baffled! --Old Moonraker (talk) 18:36, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Following recent changes to the article, may I now redact the "grandly titled pressure group" comment, above: it's a little harsh. However I'll be finding my original sources for "European Green Party" to reinstate this part. --Old Moonraker (talk) 07:28, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * "European Green Party" reinstated. Thanks User:Verbal. --Old Moonraker (talk) 08:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Professionalism
I think it says something about the ECRR that they put out the proceedings of their 2009 conference is printed with the title "Fukushima and Health: What to expect".

Sensational - yes. Professional - no. 115.163.197.60 (talk) 13:10, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on European Committee on Radiation Risk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101123022701/http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/radioprotection/doc/legislation/9629_en.pdf to http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/radioprotection/doc/legislation/9629_en.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:08, 25 September 2017 (UTC)