Talk:European School of Economics/Archives/2012

Revisions
Someone keeps editing this page to 'restore correct information', but the process this person is using actually adds no information. What it does do is remove the stub tag, remove the bolding of the article title, and remove the external links tag. This shows no respect for the agreed formatting protocol for pages. I just can't see any difference in the content. Unless we have a diference discussed on this page, I will continue to revert changes that add no supportable claims. --Duncan (talk) 15:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi Duncan please accept my most sincere apologies, simply I was not aware of the existence of such formatting protocol, as these are the first steps I have ever taken on wikipedia! Thanks for the information and keep up the good work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Luica (talk • contribs) 22:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Somebody has deleted the section regarding "Fraud and other scandals" of the European School of Economics. I want to know why wikipedia is allowing people to randomly delete any information or news, which is negative about the reputation of the school. Even though the stated information about the fraud of European School of Economics was proofed by references. If Wikipedia is not soon replying to my request, I feel I need to pursue further steps against the way how Wikipedia is dealing with this subjective self-introduction of this school's article! I think every reader and writer of Wikipedia schould be able to access critical and approved data about this school as well! See the sources below for the proof of fraud related to the European School of Economics in the past.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.83.242.250 (talk) 17:02, 18 October 2010 (UTC)


 * The Times Higher Education is a reliable source. I have added it to the article. Removing sourced information constitutes WP:VANDALISM. Tgeorgescu (talk) 21:16, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Tier 4 name spelling
The name of the institution is "european school of economics internation ltd", that's why I added a sic and a no caps. It is so written in that document, so Wikipedia should write it likewise. I have copied and pasted it directly from the reliable source. Tgeorgescu (talk) 22:02, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Latest Revisions
I've been liaising with the European School of Economics and conducted wider research to help update and improve this article. There are lots of inaccuracies that need to be cleaned up, specifically regarding the legal cases. Shall I share the updated version of the article, and proposed changes, on the Talk Page for you all to review? Thanks Vivj2012 (talk) 13:24, 17 October 2012 (UTC)