Talk:European Spallation Source

References inexistent: 404
Hey there,

the references 2,3 and 5 lead to 404 pages. Could anyone who knows what was in these references search for them? Maybe they just moved... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.230.121.55 (talk) 15:07, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, they have been updated.--ESSuser1 (talk) 16:51, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on European Spallation Source. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www2.fz-juelich.de/ua/datapool/page/466/IEF-6_Waste%20Disposal.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718172315/http://juwel.fz-juelich.de:8080/dspace/bitstream/2128/290/1/Juel_4136_Moormann.pdf to http://juwel.fz-juelich.de:8080/dspace/bitstream/2128/290/1/Juel_4136_Moormann.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Start from scratch maybe?
I'm sorry I can't be more constructive, but this article is frankly ridiculous. If this was promotional material for investors or other clueless people, you would at least disregard all the useless fluff and look at the pretty pictures. But as an encyclopedic article, of a scientific project no less, it's just a disgrace. From the history I see that some ESS PR account wrote it. I'm not surprised. My advice would be to either There's a reason it's usually ill advised to write your own Wikipedia page and the same goes for organizations tooting their own horn. --Mudd1 (talk) 17:49, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * delete the entire article and give the task to write a new one to some actual scientist involved in the project or alternatively,
 * delete the entire article and let someone who isn't involved in the project write the article.
 * I agree that there are room for improvements in this article. I have the intention to put some work with improving it. I just started with one section. BR --Bairuilong (talk) 15:16, 12 October 2022 (UTC)