Talk:Europeanisation

Untitled
What information in particular would people like cited (per the tag)? Christopher Parham (talk) 08:06, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * When I added it there were no references at all. I think the tag can probably go now. Needs better categorisation, though. -Splash talk 09:55, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

Perhaps there should be some mention of the fact that the term Europeanisation in EU studies was coined by Robert Ladrech in 1994? 193.190.134.66 14:33, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Spelling convention
Can we seriously get some standardisation here? The article, against Wikipedia's unfortunate preference for American spelling of words, is "-isation" with "-ization" given as an alternative. Given that it's intrinsically a European-related (thus British, too) subject, that is understandable; but that is no excuse for the article to alternate between the two for the remainder. The article should be the same throughout, with possible alternatives given at the top and not used again. - Locuteh —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.77.35.111 (talk) 21:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC)


 * It looks like the page had already been standardized to the British spelling convention of "Europeanisation", so I moved the article to that title. I do not have a preference, but it needs to be consistent. Kman543210 (talk) 01:33, 25 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I agree British English should be used as this is a European topic, therefore the European variant of English should be used Ijanderson (talk) 11:46, 19 June 2009 (UTC)