Talk:Eva Franch i Gilabert

Architecture Association
A sourced quotation in the AA dismissal section infringes on the Avoid Victimization rule by providing too much detail, giving over emphasis to the conflict and jeopardizing neutrality WP:AVOIDVICTIM. The quote was removed. Oikoumenikos2 (talk)
 * Disagree. WP:AVOIDVICTIM applies when "writing about a person noteworthy only for one or two events". In my opinion, the Franch article establishes noteworthiness over a wide range of events, and to not give reasons for her dismissal raises more questions than it answers. Quote reinstated. Paul W (talk) 22:09, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Quotes
The newly added Quotes section does not fit with Wikipedia's Manual of Style. Apart from attribution to Franch, their relevance is unclear - see WP:Quotes about quotations needing to be pertinent, with relevance explained. Also it says specifically "Avoid stand-alone quote sections; use Wikiquote instead" [emphasis added]. I think this should be deleted. Paul W (talk) 16:41, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Paul W, I couldn't find how the Quotes section doesn't fit into the MoS. Franch is a public figure who is known for her quips, so a section of notable examples is warranted. I saw that the Hans Ulrich Obrist page has a Quotes section, so decided to add one here. Both Obrist and Franch are curators and public figures. Oikoumenikos2 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 19:47, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I may have slightly misled you in talking generally about the MoS, but did you read WP:Quotes? Where is the reliable source that says she "is known for her quips"? And just because another article has a Quotes section (in fact, just one) does not make it relevant to this article (see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS). Paul W (talk) 22:20, 29 April 2021 (UTC)