Talk:Evanescence/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 14:40, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:40, 22 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Any update on this? Coming up on two weeks now.  danny music editor  Speak up! 17:33, 3 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Two dead external links
 * Circular disambiguation link
 * I don't get what you mean. Where is the dab link?  danny music editor  Speak up! 17:17, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Look in the toolbox in the upper right; Disambig links--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:39, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * All that it detects is the hatnote on the top of the page.  danny music editor  Speak up! 18:55, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Carry on!--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:56, 7 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Got some overlinking. Use this script to automate the process of detecing them: User:Evad37/duplinks-alt
 * Billboard ranked Evanescence number 71 on the Best Artists of the Decade chart. How is this relevant to the second para of the lede? Seems a better, but not great fit, in the first para. But might be better off in the Awards section if not already there.
 * Don't forget this.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:22, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Need to respond to the tag about the name of their former manager.
 * I have searched relentlessly for this. I have not found it. I don't know what to do.  danny music editor  Speak up! 03:00, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Strange, I'd have thought that it wouldn't have been so hard to find. I'd suggest genericizing to something like "turbulence with their management". But that bit's sourced to one of the dead links, so you need to re-establish that or drop that whole sentence.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:04, 7 February 2018 (UTC)


 * It later received an official release as a digital download on February 23, 2010. Needs a cite.
 * Some dates regarding Troy McLawhorn's rejoining and denial of same would be useful.
 * All of the awards and nominations need to be cited.
 * And this.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:22, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Which award did I miss? They all look cited to me.  danny music editor  Speak up! 17:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC)


 * That's all that struck me on this first pass.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:21, 7 February 2018 (UTC)


 * I know it looks like I haven't had any recent progress, but I've been working on it little by little on my computer - I'd like to save the rest of it all at once.  danny music editor  Speak up! 00:57, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * That's fine; I'm hardly in any position to criticize anyone for working slowly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:01, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Status?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:20, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Came to check my watchlist for vandalism and saw this. Will be done tomorrow, have plenty of time. What I should be doing right now is writing an essay for my English class.  danny music editor  Speak up! 22:42, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * OK, lemme know when you're done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:23, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

✅ with awards. I think that's all you asked for. Let me know what else comes on second pass, if you take one.  danny music editor  Speak up! 04:26, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * becoming the 700th No. 1 album in Billboard since the chart became a weekly feature in 1956. This is pretty much trivia and can go, IMO.
 * Still got a couple of my original points above that need to be addressed--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:22, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I'd have sworn that there was one uncited award, but I surely don't see it now. We're done here.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:38, 11 March 2018 (UTC)