Talk:Eve Borsook

CourtauldGill (talk) 12:46, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

worldcat a.o.
It is really unnerving to see all these links in the bibliographies, but, as it turns out there are not only all identical, they just lead to an bibliograpgical entry and ends there. One hopes for a digital copy of a book, and instead one gets frustrated several times over. The double and triple link epidemia has to end, there has to be another solution (merge them into one). It doesn't help anyone, it's just administrative bs. Sure, you want to do it right, but you can't overwrite the service of accessibility and clearness with redundant self-serving over-linking. MenkinAlRire 18:45, 25 September 2023 (UTC)