Talk:Everard Calthrop/GA1

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:Everard Calthrop/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Done. --Michael Johnson (talk) 01:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. --Michael Johnson (talk) 01:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Done. --Michael Johnson (talk) 11:04, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. --Michael Johnson (talk) 11:04, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Wish I knew too! I have yet to come across a biographical article about Calthrop, the information I have comes from what are basicly technical books. All biographical information I have has been included. I have improved the explanation of the other points you raised, hope they are ok. --Michael Johnson (talk) 04:03, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Wish I knew too! I have yet to come across a biographical article about Calthrop, the information I have comes from what are basicly technical books. All biographical information I have has been included. I have improved the explanation of the other points you raised, hope they are ok. --Michael Johnson (talk) 04:03, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * I did find a photo on a website, but cannot establish whether it is in the public domain, so had to delete it. Still looking. --Michael Johnson (talk) 06:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It depends on whether the image was created during his lifetime or not, and the rules regarding public domain (or its equivalent) in India or England. I know in the U.S. anything published before 1979 (or thereabouts) is PD, but I'm not familiar with other countries' laws. &mdash; Rob (  talk  ) 13:25, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I did find a photo on a website, but cannot establish whether it is in the public domain, so had to delete it. Still looking. --Michael Johnson (talk) 06:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It depends on whether the image was created during his lifetime or not, and the rules regarding public domain (or its equivalent) in India or England. I know in the U.S. anything published before 1979 (or thereabouts) is PD, but I'm not familiar with other countries' laws. &mdash; Rob (  talk  ) 13:25, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It depends on whether the image was created during his lifetime or not, and the rules regarding public domain (or its equivalent) in India or England. I know in the U.S. anything published before 1979 (or thereabouts) is PD, but I'm not familiar with other countries' laws. &mdash; Rob (  talk  ) 13:25, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Looks sharp. Well done! &mdash; Rob (  talk  ) 16:04, 1 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Passing since it meets the GA criteria. If a picture of the man is found, that works, but it's not required. Congrats! &mdash; Rob (  talk  ) 13:25, 2 June 2008 (UTC)