Talk:Evernote/Archives/2016

Shifting article of Evernote as a company
I was wondering if it would make more sense to shift Evernote as a company rather than as a software. Evernote has shipped a variety of applications including Skitch, Penultimate, Webclipper, etc and I think it would make more sense to have Evernote Corporation at the top rather than in the middle. Or perhaps we could move Evernote Corporation into its own article?

I just want to be clear and abide by Wikipedia's rules that I do work for Evernote and the reason we want to do this is because Google is having trouble associating us with their knowledge graph as a company. I don't want to conflict with the interest of the Wikipedia community though.

Thoughts?

Augbog (talk) 23:46, 30 September 2015 (UTC)


 * I would think that most people looking for "Evernote" intend the software. It would not be unreasonable to create a new article "Evernote Corporation" using the content of the section by that name. I don't think it makes sense to turn the article for the software into an article for the company. Right now the history section is a weird mix of software and corporate info. If this looks like a good idea, I could make a quick edit to start the ECorp article. LaMona (talk) 18:00, 30 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Since the article is predominantly about the software developed by the corporation, IMO the info should be presented in that order. I personally think the corporation is notable enough to have it's own article, linking to this and it's other notable works.
 * I've marked the edit request as declined; I agree with LaMona. If you feel it's appropriate, you can reopen the request. fredgandt 19:49, 10 March 2016 (UTC)


 * It sounds like we are okay with creating a new article for "Evernote Corporation" and just reusing the content from this article? I also don't believe we should get rid of Evernote as a software article for the same reason -- most people know Evernote as the software. The truth is Evernote Corp has shipped other products i.e. Scannable, Penultimate, Skitch, etc so I feel it makes sense to make a separate Evernote Corporation article. Let me know your guys' thoughts but for now I've removed the declined requested edit. Augbog (talk) 18:22, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Evernote. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20120530/http://www.lextrait.com/Vincent/implementations.html to http://www.lextrait.com/Vincent/implementations.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:22, 27 December 2016 (UTC)