Talk:Everybody's Fool/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 12:52, 4 December 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * "F Major" -> "F major" ✅
 * "She also portrays an extreme motorcycle girl in a commercial who drinks a soft drink called "Lies" that affords its drinker the opportunity to "Be somebody."[14]" - what does "extreme" means? Is this POV? ✅
 * "In another Japanese commercial she is playing " - not sure why you switched to simple present ✅
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * References are ok, but could you replace the Amazon refs with another, more reliable?
 * ❌ Amazon is reliable.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * see above about "extreme"
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * Dabsolver check: ok
 * Checklinks check: ok
 * Reflinks check: ok
 * Fixed dashes
 * All in all a very nice article
 * Hold and I will pass if you fix the issues.
 * Everything ✅. My love is love (talk) 16:49, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, I will pass! Very nice article! :)