Talk:Evofosfamide

various problems
Collaboration - typo - eVofosfamide. Mechanism of prodrug activation - NADPH cytochrome P450 should presumably be NADPH cytochrome P450 reductase (but check if that is only a 2-electron reductase). Formulation - what is WFI? For clarity I suggest changing "DEHP" to "DEHP plasticizer" (but is this sentence too specialized to be worth including?) Clinical trials - is it worth including all this detail? A much briefer summary might be better. NCT01144455 - Interventions - TH-302 is listed twice. NCT00742963 - why is progression free survival different (6.7 or 6.5) for what appears to be the same group of subjects? NCT01440088 - typo - analyses haVE NCT01522872 - Interventions - TH-302 is listed twice; dexamethasone isn't listed. NCT01403619 - How can the study be recruiting if it has reported results? Interventions only lists TH-302 & placebo but Results lists bevacizumab/TH-302 combionation therapy. Why does PFS differ (3.1 or 2.8)? NCT01721941 - Intervention - Phase I is not a drug. Soft tissue sarcoma - delete, after Both. delete trial after (TH-CR-403). Metastatic pancreatic cancer - delete, after Both. Drug development risks - Given that "Merck will not apply for a license" this section should probably be deleted. Typo - payors dependS upon 69.72.92.70 (talk) 01:09, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

The Drug development risks section may as well be deleted
It could as well apply to every drug in development - Adds almost nothing to this article - If the risks are different than other drugs then could just highlight the differences. Ironic that trial failure (as seems to have happened) was not identified as a risk. May as well delete entire section ? or reduce to 1 line if there is anything significant ? - Rod57 (talk) 01:49, 14 March 2016 (UTC)